The voter-approved law passed in 2020 aimed at increasing treatment and services for drug addiction. It also decriminalized small amounts of illicit drugs for personal use. The council voted six to two in favor of the resolution.
Councilor Kevin Stine voted no. Though he said he does not support Measure 110, he questioned how much it was to blame for rising overdoses, which are occurring well beyond Oregon.
鈥淚 believe, in my opinion, there is a massive rush to try to pin it on something. And in Oregon, we say 鈥110 is the problem. If we get rid of it, then everything is going to be fine.鈥 And that鈥檚 just not the case,鈥 Stine said.
Councilor Chad Miller voted in favor of the resolution. As a Jackson County Sheriff Deputy, he said the prevalence of illicit drugs is overwhelming and overdoses have become a regular occurance during his job.
鈥淚t is spiking to a level in the last three months where I personally have done CPR first aid and saved three individuals during my shift. And on my days off, I come back to ODs constantly,鈥 he said.
鈥淒o I think Measure 110 alone is to blame? Maybe not entirely, but it is definitely a system used to make it more accessible,鈥 Miller said.
With the vote, Medford joins a movement of cities and counties in the state pushing to repeal the measure. In the last month, the Jackson County and Coos County Boards of Commissioners called for the repeal of Measure 110. On Wednesday, Portland City Council banned the use of hard drugs on public property 鈥 though would need to change in order to make that possible. The Clackamas County Board of Commissioners will also be asking voters next spring if the measure should be repealed, according to the .
鈥淚t will probably be our top legislative priority for the short session, and we will, with other cities and counties that are passing similar resolutions, try to effect change,鈥 said Medford City Manager Brian Sjothun during Thursday鈥檚 meeting.
The Medford City Council鈥檚 resolution states that Measure 110 has not reduced drug overdose deaths in the state. Instead, it cites data showing a significant in overdose deaths since the measure鈥檚 passage, and says an increase in drug activity has negatively impacted 鈥渃ommunity livability鈥 throughout the state.
鈥淚t has become dramatically apparent that Measure 110 has not delivered as it was proposed to the voters and is missing the mark when it comes to addressing addiction,鈥 said Medford Mayor Randy Sparacino in a press release. 鈥淚 am pleased to see that our council and city leadership are moving forward with a resolution seeking a repeal of Measure 110 by our state legislators and if that isn鈥檛 possible, significant and necessary changes to the measure.鈥
If a repeal is not viable, the proposed modifications include restoring misdemeanor status for the possession of methamphetamine, heroine and similar drugs, contingent on the availability of drug courts. It also suggests incentivizing the use of existing health resources like the substance use assessment hotline.
The resolution follows a series of town hall meetings in Medford, where the impact of Measure 110 on the Southern Oregon city was a regular point of concern from residents. An August 2023 poll by Emerson College Polling shows that 56% of Oregon voters believe the measure should be repealed completely, and 64% believe parts should be repealed.
JPR News Director Erik Neumann contributed to this story.