老夫子传媒

漏 2024 | 老夫子传媒
Southern Oregon University
1250 Siskiyou Blvd.
Ashland, OR 97520
541.552.6301 | 800.782.6191
Listen | Discover | Engage a service of Southern Oregon University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Republican senators sue Oregon secretary of state, saying walkout doesn鈥檛 block them from seeking reelection

Sens. Dennis Linthicum, R-Beatty, and Tim Knopp, R-Bend, are among five senators suing Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade.
Kristyna Wentz-Graff
/
OPB
Sens. Dennis Linthicum, R-Beatty, and Tim Knopp, R-Bend, are among five senators suing Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade.

The senators say Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade cannot bar them from seeking another term because of a constitutional loophole

Republican state senators who walked away from this year鈥檚 Oregon legislative session to block votes on abortion rights and gun safety say they should be allowed to run for reelection next year, regardless of a voter-approved law aimed at ending their legislative careers.

Now they鈥檙e suing for that right.

In a case with weighty implications for the legislative process in Salem, five Republican senators filed suit Friday against Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade. They are Sens. Tim Knopp, Daniel Bonham, Suzanne Weber, Lynn Findley and Dennis Linthicum.

The Republican lawmakers are hoping to convince the Oregon Court of Appeals that voters were misled last November when they passed, a law designed to end walkouts that Republicans have used repeatedly in recent years to halt business at the Capitol.

Under Measure 113, any lawmaker who accrues 10 or more unexcused absences during a legislative session is blocked from seeking reelection. The question posed by the lawsuit is when.

In explanatory statements, news stories and other documents, the intent of Measure 113 was clear: Lawmakers would be barred immediately from running again.

But the five senators say the actual verbiage inserted into the state Constitution didn鈥檛 accomplish that aim. That language says a lawmaker who runs afoul of Measure 113 cannot hold office 鈥渇or the term following the election after the member鈥檚 current term is completed.鈥

Since elections in Oregon are held before a lawmakers term is completed 鈥 elections occur in November, whereas legislative terms don鈥檛 end until the following January 鈥 Republicans say the constitution allows them to serve another term before penalties take effect.

鈥淧etitioners believe that the plain text of the Constitutional Amendment, and only interpretation consistent therewith, is that any disqualification must apply to the 鈥榯erm following the election after the member鈥檚 current term is complete,鈥欌 the filing says. That would mean that Knopp, Findley and Linthicum, whose terms expire next year, would be able to file for reelection this year. Bonham and Weber鈥檚 terms don鈥檛 end until 2026.

Griffin-Valade feels differently. On advice from the Oregon Department of Justice, that blocks lawmakers who walked out from running again. In doing so, the secretary aligned with many Democrats鈥 view of the matter: that voters鈥 intention in passing Measure 113 takes precedence over the ambiguous wording. 鈥淢y decision honors the voters鈥 intent by enforcing the measure the way it was commonly understood when Oregonians added it to our state constitution,鈥 Griffin-Valade said when announcing .

Since the Republican lawmakers are appealing Griffin-Valade鈥檚 rule in their lawsuit, they were able to file a case directly before the Oregon Court of Appeals, rather than first filing in a lower court. Their attorney, John DiLorenzo, said Friday that attorneys for the state have agreed the case should be expedited 鈥 potentially directly to the Oregon Supreme Court.

In all, 10 conservative state senators accrued enough unexcused absences to run afoul of Measure 113 when they launched a six-week walkout to block bills on abortion and guns earlier this year. The boycott created a potential crisis in Salem, raising doubts that the Legislature would be able to pass a new budget. In the end, Republicans and Democrats in which Republicans returned to the building in exchange for Democrats scrapping key pieces of controversial bills.

Republican lawmakers are paying handsomely for the legal challenge. A political action committee set up to fund the effort is currently listed in state filings as nearly $60,000 in the hole, after a sizeable legal bill from DiLorenzo鈥檚 firm.

Copyright 2023

Dirk VanderHart covers Oregon politics and government for Oregon Public Broadcasting, a JPR news partner. His reporting comes to JPR through the Northwest News Network, a collaboration between public media organizations in Oregon and Washington.