California has decided to abandon its groundbreaking regulations phasing out diesel trucks and requiring cleaner locomotives because the incoming Trump administration is unlikely to allow the state to implement them.
State officials have long considered the rules essential to cleaning up 颁补濒颈蹿辞谤苍颈补鈥檚 severe air pollution and combating climate change.
The withdrawal comes after the Biden administration recently approved the California Air Resources Board鈥檚 by 2035, but had not yet approved waivers for four other standards for diesel vehicles that the state adopted.
President-elect Donald J. Trump has threatened to revoke or challenge all zero-emission vehicle rules and 颁补濒颈蹿辞谤苍颈补鈥檚 other clean-air standards. By withdrawing its requests for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approval, the Newsom administration is signaling a dramatic step back as the state recalibrates in anticipation of the new Trump era.
鈥淐alifornia has withdrawn its pending waiver and authorization requests that U.S. EPA has not yet acted on,鈥� Air Resources Board Chair Liane Randolph said in a statement. 鈥淲hile we are disappointed that U.S. EPA was unable to act on all the requests in time, the withdrawal is an important step given the uncertainty presented by the incoming administration that previously attacked 颁补濒颈蹿辞谤苍颈补鈥檚 programs to protect public health and the climate and has said will continue to oppose those programs.鈥�
Environmentalists were distressed, saying it puts communities at risk and dismantles key programs.
鈥淭o meet basic standards for healthy air, California has to shift to zero-emissions trucks and trains in the coming years. Diesel is one of the most dangerous kinds of air pollution for human health, and 颁补濒颈蹿辞谤苍颈补鈥檚 diesel problem is big enough to cast its own shadow,鈥� Paul Cort, director of the group Earthjustice鈥檚 Right To Zero campaign, said in a statement. 鈥淲e鈥檒l be working tirelessly in the coming years 鈥� and calling on Governor Newsom, state legislators, and our air quality regulators to join us 鈥� to clean up our freight system and fix the mess EPA鈥檚 inaction has created.鈥�
颁补濒颈蹿辞谤苍颈补鈥檚 rule, which phases out diesel trucks, was one of the most far-reaching and controversial rules that California has enacted in recent years to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases. It would have ended the sale of new fossil-fuel trucks in 2036 and required large trucking companies to convert their medium and heavy-duty fleets to electric or hydrogen models by 2042.
The truck fleet rule, after years of analysis, public hearings and discussions with industries and experts, was one of the most controversial and aggressive rules that the board has ever adopted. It would have ended diesel鈥檚 stronghold on goods movement in the state, with potentially profound effects on the state鈥檚 environment and economy.
Trucking companies had already sued the state to stop the rule, saying electric and hydrogen big rigs are not practical for many uses and that it would destroy the state鈥檚 economy.
鈥淭he California Trucking Association has consistently stated the Advanced Clean Fleets Rule was unachievable,鈥� Eric Sauer, chief executive of the association, said in a statement. He said the industry would work with the state air board and EPA 鈥渢o further reduce emissions in a technologically feasible and cost-effective manner. that preserves our State and the Nation鈥檚 critical supply chain.鈥�
Diesel exhaust has been linked to cancer and contains fine particles that can trigger asthma and heart attacks as well as gases that form smog. have long complained about noxious and dangerous diesel exhaust.
In addition, the state withdrew three other measures, including ones regulating emissions from diesel-powered , and that are hauled by trucks and rail cars.
Under the locomotive rule, only locomotives less than 23 years old would have been allowed in California beginning in 2030, unless they were zero emissions. The rule also limited how long they could idle. People living in communities with trains and rail yards have long complained that the emissions are making them sick. no zero-emission locomotive technology exists yet so the rule鈥檚 鈥渢imeline is impossible,鈥� and that it would prematurely retire viable equipment and disrupt goods movement.
Under the Clean Air Act, Congress more than a half-century ago granted California the unique ability to set its own aggressive emission standards for cars, trucks and other vehicles because of its severe smog. But the federal EPA must grant California a waiver to implement them.
For decades, the EPA has granted California the waivers. Only one waiver was initially denied 鈥� a 2008 rule setting greenhouse gas emission standards for cars 鈥� and that decision .
But when Trump was last in office, his administration took aim at the state鈥檚 to enact stricter rules 鈥� one of the more significant environmental clashes of the first Trump era. The Biden administration in 2022 those efforts.
California air-quality officials have been waiting for years for the Biden administration鈥檚 EPA to approve the last four rules, hoping that time wouldn鈥檛 run out. But the EPA failed to act in time.
Randolph told CalMatters that the EPA had informed California that it did not have time to complete the four waivers, prompting the air board to withdraw them.
鈥淥nce we knew that, we realized that we needed to deploy an offensive strategy to make sure that we maintained control of the waivers, and so we pulled them back,鈥� Randolph said. 鈥淭he Trump administration has not indicated a lot of support for our clean air and climate strategy, right? So our concern was that if we leave them hanging out there, we don鈥檛 know what they鈥檙e going to do with them. So we thought it would be better to maintain control.鈥�
What鈥檚 more, Randolph said litigation will be increasingly likely under the incoming Trump administration so it was time to 鈥減rotect and defend the work that we鈥檝e already done.鈥� Some business groups have already sued to try to block the mandate banning sales of gas-powered cars in 2035.
鈥淲e know there鈥檚 going to be a lot of litigation in the offing, whether it鈥檚 entities suing us, or us going on the offense and trying to protect our ability to move forward to address both air quality and climate change,鈥� she said.
California may have to suspend any future rule-making for vehicles over the next four years of the Trump administration. The state may have to rely instead on voluntary agreements with engine manufacturers, trucking companies, railroads and other industries.
鈥淭he California Air Resources Board is assessing its option to continue its progress as part of its commitment to move forward the important work of improving the state鈥檚 air quality and reducing harmful pollutants that contribute to poor health outcomes and worsen climate change,鈥� Randolph said in the statement.
鈥淚t鈥檚 clear that the public health, air quality, and climate challenges that California faces require urgent action. We are ready and committed to continuing the important work of building a clean air future.鈥�
The truck fleet rule would have affected about 1.8 million medium and heavy-duty trucks on California roads, including those used by FedEx, UPS and Amazon. The trucking industry had cited the high costs of zero-emission vehicles, limited charging and fueling infrastructure, and the financial burden on small operators.
Some provisions, for drayage trucks that serve ports, were supposed to be implemented already, but the air board put them on hold pending the outcome of the Biden administration鈥檚 approval.
Some companies, including , have already rolled out electric and hydrogen fleets. Amazon has deployed 50 heavy-duty electric trucks in Southern California as well as hundreds of nationally. Sales of zero-emissions trucks have increased despite no deadlines having kicked in. In 2023, 鈥� more than 18,000 鈥� were zero emissions.