Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers unveiled their plan Friday to protect California from a looming tsunami of evictions caused by the economic fallout from the novel coronavirus pandemic. Not everyone is going to like it.
The 鈥�,鈥� the product of contentious, last-minute negotiations that flirted with the constitutional deadline to finalize legislative language, protects renters financially impacted by the coronavirus pandemic from eviction until February 2021. The bill also proposes some foreclosure protections to small landlords suffering from missed rent payments. Legislators vote on the bill on Monday.
鈥淎bsolutely you鈥檒l hear from some, not just those representing tenants鈥hat will express that we could have done more, done better,鈥� said Newsom. 鈥淏ut the totality and the consequence of what we were able to achieve in terms of mitigating the prospects of millions, literally millions of people being evicted or at least subject to eviction, substantially was mitigated because of this effort.鈥�
Hamstrung by a recently patched and about the limits of state power to interfere in private contracts, some Democratic lawmakers stressed the bill is intended as a bridge to next year, by which time they hope a second round of federal stimulus spending will free up new rental assistance funds for cash-strapped California. Another round of boosted unemployment benefits 鈥� which experts said kept many renters afloat before they expire at the end of July 鈥� could also help beleaguered tenants.
The California Apartment Association, the premier landlord lobbying group in the Capitol, has endorsed the proposal, while eagerly awaiting a federal hand flush with cash.
鈥淭o truly address this crisis, the federal government needs to step up,鈥� wrote Debra Carlton, executive vice president of public affairs for CAA, in a blog post. 鈥淐OVID-impacted renters need financial assistance, from the feds, so they can pay their rent.鈥�
Tenant advocacy groups, while pleased with certain protections afforded by the bill, expressed disappointment that not all renters would be protected from evictions for a longer period of time. They argue that displaced renters will inevitably end up in environments in which coronavirus thrives: doubled-up apartments, homeless shelters, and inter-generational homes.
A found that nearly one million renter households in California have had a member lose their job due to the pandemic and could be vulnerable to eviction.
鈥淔or our low-income clients this bill provides important protections for those who can鈥檛 pay the rent, and we hope that the Legislature acts effectively to pass it on Monday,鈥� said Brian Augusta, a legislative advocate for the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation. 鈥淏ut I will note it leaves unresolved the question of evictions for many other tenants.鈥�
Here鈥檚 what you need to know about what鈥檚 in the proposal 鈥� and what鈥檚 not.
Renters will still owe all the rent they missed so far. They can be evicted starting Feb. 1 if they miss more than 25% of their future rent.
The deal prohibits landlords from using missed rent payments accrued between March and Aug. 31 as a legal basis to evict tenants, as long as the tenant fills out legal paperwork attesting to financial hardship from COVID-19. Tenants rights groups had long sought this provision.
However, renters will have to pay a portion of their rent going forward. Tenants financially impacted by COVID-19 would be obligated to pay 25% of their rent between Sept. 1 and Jan. 31 of 2021 to avoid being evicted starting in February.
Renters can come up with that 25% anytime between September and Jan. 31, 2021 鈥� a lump sum payment days before February is allowed.
While renters can miss some payments and still be shielded from eviction, they will still be legally liable for their full rental debt. Starting March 1 2021, landlords can pursue all rent that鈥檚 owed from the start of the pandemic in small claims court.
While many tenant groups chafe at the notion that any rental debt accrued during the pandemic should be paid in full, landlords may take little comfort in the provision. While they may be legally entitled to missed rent payments, landlords may have a difficult time actually recouping funds鈥搒pecially if tenants simply don鈥檛 have the resources.
An from Sen. Toni Atkins, a Democrat from San Diego and leader of the state Senate, would have given renters until 2024 to begin repaying rental debt. Under that proposal, renters making below a certain percentage of state median income would have seen their debts reduced.
Renters can be evicted for other lease violations starting next week
While evictions for missed rent payments related to coronavirus may be frozen until February, evictions for other lease violations can proceed starting Sept. 2, according to the terms of the deal released Friday.
Landlord groups insisted on that provision, arguing that the state court system鈥檚 blanket moratorium on all evictions has allowed renters to break leases in ways that endanger their property and the comfort of neighboring renters.
鈥淲e applaud the Legislature and governor for advancing legislation with protections for tenants truly harmed by COVID, while ensuring that owners can evict nuisance tenants and residents who can afford to pay rent but choose to game the system instead,鈥� said Tom Bannon, chief executive officer of the California Apartment Association, in a statement.
Tenant groups charge that considering the public health imperatives of Newsom鈥檚 shelter in place order, all evictions except in cases of public health and safety should be barred for at least a few more months. They also worry about landlords using other lease violations as a pretext for removing renters who owe them back rent.
鈥淲hat the governor has announced today is an imperfect but necessary solution to a colossal problem,鈥� said Assemblymember David Chiu, a Democrat from San Francisco, who introduced a previous eviction protection bill backed by tenant groups. 鈥淭he bill is definitely not all that鈥檚 needed to protect all tenants, but it will prevent and delay many evictions. Doing nothing would be catastrophic.鈥�
The bill also prohibits local governments from essentially trying to override the new state law when it comes to evictions based on missed rent payments. However, cities and counties could enact new rules to ban evictions in cases unrelated to non-payment of rent. has banned evictions in cases unrelated to COVID through Dec. 1.
Some tenant groups Newsom to issue another executive order extending a statewide eviction moratorium through the end of the year.
How will renters prove they are financially impacted by COVID to qualify for eviction protection?
Renters making below 130% of statewide median household income (roughly over $90,000) will have 15 days after being served an eviction notice to sign legal paperwork declaring they鈥檝e suffered a loss of income, have higher medical bills or have otherwise been financially impacted by COVID-19. They can also bring up their financial situation in court as an allowable defense if they don鈥檛 fill out the necessary paperwork within 15 days.
Higher-income renters will be required to provide some documentation of their income loss to qualify for eviction protections.
No money for small landlords, but some foreclosure protections
Landlord groups had initially lent tentative support to a proposal that would have granted them future tax credits in the amount of the missed rent they were owed. But that plan was ultimately shelved, partly out of fears that it was impractical to administer and expensive for the state.
Until new federal stimulus spending is approved, landlords will have to wait until March to begin recovering missed rent payments. Some smaller landlords may be especially hard pressed to wait that long to meet monthly mortgage payments. Mortgages not backed by the federal government do not qualify for some of the forbearance programs Congress and the Trump administration created in response to the pandemic.
The proposal extends the 2013 鈥�,鈥� passed in the wake of the late 2000鈥檚 foreclosure crisis, to small, non-corporate landlords who own up to 4 units. Those 鈥渞ights鈥� include specific guidelines mortgage servicers must obey in notifying and communicating with borrowers, as well as a prohibition against 鈥渄ual track鈥� foreclosures where lenders are allowed to pursue foreclosures while simultaneously negotiating loan modification deals.
But the bill stops short of compelling banks, credit unions and other lenders from offering mortgage forbearance upon request of small landlords. Many lawmakers thought the state was on shaky legal ground regulating banking activities that are typically the federal government鈥檚 territory.
The vote ahead
In order to have the bill take effect immediately, two-thirds of legislators in both the state Senate and Assembly will have to vote for it on Monday. That鈥檚 a high bar for any bill, but with support from Newsom, state legislative leaders and key interest groups like the California Apartment Association, Democratic leadership is cautiously optimistic.
Assemblymember Chiu reiterated that despite his disappointment with certain provisions in the bill, he hopes for more aid from Washington D.C.
鈥淟et鈥檚 be clear this is a temporary fix. As we track the impact of the pandemic and recession on tenants, we will have to revisit this conversation early next year,鈥� said Chiu.
CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.