Schools in 30 of Oregon鈥檚 36 counties 鈥� and schools in other Western states 鈥� will receive less federal funding in 2025 after the U.S. House of Representatives failed to reauthorize a 24-year-old bill that typically pays up to $80 million a year for schools and roads in Oregon along with wildfire prevention and conservation work.
The bipartisan 鈥� first passed in 2000 鈥� was reauthorized by the Senate in November. But by Friday, in the run-up to passage of a to keep the government open until March, House Republicans could not reach agreement about how the rural schools bill should be funded and so it died without a vote, said Hank Stern, a spokesman for Oregon鈥檚 senior senator, Democrat Ron Wyden, who co-authored the original bill in 2000. Wyden said the failure to approve the money will create needless pain for rural communities.
鈥淭his sad state of affairs due to congressional Republican failings is pointless and regrettable,鈥� he said in an email. 鈥淥regonians living and working in counties that have long relied on millions in federal Secure Rural Schools funds will needlessly and unfortunately enter 2025 with an uncertain fate for those resources when it comes to local schools. roads, law enforcement and more.鈥�
Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo, a Republican who worked with Wyden to get the bill passed in the Senate, said in an email he shared Wyden鈥檚 frustration.
鈥淪enator Wyden and I worked diligently to secure SRS funding for rural counties,鈥� Crapo said.
The Republicans decided not to vote on the bill amid a dispute about health care funding that would have killed the stop-gap bill, Stern said.
The Secure Rural Schools bill for years has sent hundreds of millions of dollars to counties in 41 states and Puerto Rico that have federal land within their borders. Because those counties provide critical services to people and industries using those lands for activities that generate revenue for the federal government 鈥� such as animal grazing and timber production 鈥� the federal government sends money back to those counties to help them pay for critical services and to weather other changes. In the West, the money has largely helped keep county and school budgets whole following reduced logging and a reduction in timber revenue from federal forests in the 1990s to save imperiled species. The payments have equaled the average amount counties received from timber harvests from the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management in the top three timber-producing years of the 1980s. Oregon has received $4 billion in funding from the bill in the last 24 years.
This year, 30 counties in Oregon got nearly $74 million through the act, according to Wyden鈥檚 office. And in 2023, according to the latest U.S. Forest Service , 12 counties in Alaska received $12.6 million; 34 counties in Idaho got $25 million; 32 counties in Montana received $16 million; and 25 counties in Washington state received about $18 million.
In recent years, the bill has been championed on a rotating basis by Wyden or a Republican senator from Idaho. Stern said that this year, Wyden had leaned on Crapo to advocate for the bill鈥檚 passage in the Republican-controlled House.
Crapo, ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, said he鈥檒l push for the bill next year when he鈥檒l take the reins of the committee under Republican control of the Senate.
鈥淚 will continue to advocate for this legislation during the upcoming Trump administration,鈥� said Crapo.
Wyden, now Finance Committee chair who will become the ranking member next year, said he鈥檒l be pushing for passage, too.
鈥淚 am committed to working with anybody, anywhere at the start of the new year who鈥檚 serious about reauthorizing these vital investments ASAP for rural communities in Oregon and nationwide,鈥� Wyden said.