The Senate鈥檚 16-14 vote on , with bipartisan support and opposition, is a compromise. The bill鈥檚 sponsor, Sen. Kim Thatcher, R-Keizer, lacked the votes in February for Oregon to lead the way in switching to standard time on the West Coast. The bill was changed to add a trigger clause that would make the proposal go into effect if California and Washington also switched to standard time.
鈥淚t just keeps us in sync with the states around us,鈥� Thatcher said on the Senate floor.
The bill now heads to the House, It opens the debate about the advantages and disadvantages of changing clocks, a routine each fall and spring to adjust the clock to daylight.
With the session is in its final week and bills flying through, the proposal passed without the that covered religious, health and economic considerations on Feb. 20. But senators still talked about the bill.
Sen. Aaron Woods, D-Wilsonville, voted against the proposal. He said he believed a switch to permanent daylight saving time rather than permanent standard time would be best.
That would mean extended daylight hours in the evening, reducing traffic accidents and stimulating the economy with more spending in local businesses, he said.
鈥淚 firmly believe the path to permanent daylight savings time is the one that serves the best interests of Oregon,鈥� Woods said.
On the other side of the debate, Sen. Elizabeth Steiner, D-Portland and supporter of the bill, said exposure to daylight in the morning is best, especially in the winter months. A permanent switch to standard time would also allow people who say prayers after sunrise to gather earlier, Steiner has said.
Overall, the switch would be the best for mental health and consistency, said Steiner, also a doctor.
鈥淭here is no question that this bill has generated an enormous amount of controversy.鈥� Steiner said.
The bill would only apply to the portion of Oregon in the Pacific Time Zone, not the part of Oregon on Mountain time, which is Malheur County bordering Idaho.
Sen. Lynn Findley, R-Vale, said he remains concerned because if neighboring Idaho were to change, another bill would be necessary to align the eastern Oregon county鈥檚 time with Idaho.
The is a professional, nonprofit news organization. We are an affiliate of , a national 501(c)(3) nonprofit supported by grants and a coalition of donors and readers. The Capital Chronicle retains full editorial independence, meaning decisions about news and coverage are made by Oregonians for Oregonians.