Three board members of the Douglas County Republican Party have so far been unsuccessful in getting a petition approved that seeks to force the county to hand-count ballots in future elections.
The group has submitted six petitions to the Douglas County Clerk since last year. According to County Clerk Dan Loomis, all have been denied. That means the group isn鈥檛 allowed to officially collect signatures. The latest proposal was denied in mid-October.
鈥淭he people have a right to have a petition on this subject,鈥� said Myrtle Creek resident Terry Noonkester, one of the petitioners. 鈥淚t seems to be a taboo subject.鈥�
Noonkester is an at-large member of the Douglas County GOP board.
She argued that electronic voting machines aren鈥檛 transparent, and the machines can鈥檛 be checked by the public.
requires voting machines to be approved by the Secretary of State. Elections must also be carried out with a team of experts in the fields of data processing, mechanical engineering and public administration. Voting machines are audited and checked for their accuracy as well.
鈥淚 just don鈥檛 think that power should be centralized,鈥� Noonkester said. 鈥淲here one person is making a decision that I think belongs to the people. Whether the people feel that comfortable with the machines.鈥�
County Clerk Dan Loomis said the latest petition didn鈥檛 meet the requirements of being a matter of county concern and being legislative.
鈥淚鈥檓 not saying that hand-counting is good or bad,鈥� Loomis said. 鈥淚鈥檓 just determining this petition that asks us to do hand-counting does not pass the constitutional test.鈥�
Loomis declined to further define what those requirements mean: being a matter of county concern and being legislative. He said he didn鈥檛 want to provide legal advice to the petitioners.
According to the Secretary of State鈥檚 office, the terms 鈥渃ounty concern鈥� and 鈥渓egislative鈥� in this context don鈥檛 have official definitions, and it鈥檚 up to the county clerk to determine if the initiative meets state constitutional requirements.
The Oregon Secretary of State last year that essentially bans hand-counting elections in the state. And state law defines how elections are run.
Hand counting has a place in Oregon elections, primarily as a means to check the results of a machine to verify its accuracy, Loomis said. Hand-counting often requires staff to sit at a table doing repetitive tasks for hours, which inevitably lead to mistakes, said Loomis.
Noonkester and the other petitioners could appeal their denial to Douglas County circuit court and have a judge decide on the matter. But, Loomis said they haven鈥檛 appealed any of the previous six denials.
Noonkester said they plan to challenge the decision, but with only seven business days to appeal, they have little time to draft a response.
鈥淵ou start calling lawyers and you find out you don鈥檛 get to see the lawyer for a month or two, or they鈥檙e not even taking clients,鈥� she said.
Loomis said he compares the accuracy of counting ballots with humans to his former career as an aircraft crash investigator.
鈥�80-90% of all accidents are human error,鈥� he said.
