For six months, Gov. Gavin Newsom waged a highly public battle against the oil industry, accusing companies of fleecing Californians as gasoline prices soared to record levels last year and urging lawmakers to .
He finally got to Tuesday as he signed a first-in-the-nation law that could lead to a cap on earnings for oil refiners.
鈥淲e proved we can actually beat Big Oil,鈥� Newsom said during a ceremony under the state Capitol rotunda.
But the measure Newsom signed is still a far cry from what he initially suggested in the fall, reflecting the political perils inherent in taking on an industry that may be a major villain for liberals but also provides a product used daily by millions of Californians.
Nor is this particular showdown likely over.
A representative for the oil industry, which fiercely fought the governor鈥檚 efforts, said refiners who operate in the state will closely monitor the development of regulations under the law and whether the Legislature pursues additional bills to address their lingering concerns before deciding whether to mount a legal challenge.
鈥淭hen we鈥檒l have a better sense of, will this work, and do we need to step in?鈥� said Kevin Slagle, a spokesperson for the Western States Petroleum Association.
Newsom set off a frenzy at the end of September, as the average price of gas at the pump surged past $6 past per gallon, when he on oil company profits, an idea favored by progressives that has never gained traction at the Capitol. Within a week, he announced that he would later in the year to push for the proposal, using a penalty on excess profits to fund a rebate for taxpayers.
At issue were California鈥檚 retail gasoline prices, which are not only expensive, but far more expensive than the rest of the country 鈥� by last fall, the gap had grown to more than $2.60 per gallon higher than the national average, an ignominious record. The oil industry says this is caused by greater taxes and regulations in the state, but Newsom argued that greedy companies were taking advantage of global shortages.
鈥淭his is one of the greatest rip-offs in modern American history that鈥檚 been happening here in California,鈥� Newsom told reporters after signing the bill.
Though many legislators agreed with the governor鈥檚 assessment that taxes and regulations alone could not explain the steep prices their constituents were paying, his initial plan 鈥� to and fine those who exceeded the threshold 鈥� stalled for months at the Capitol without action. Even Democratic allies feared that, without more information, they might unintentionally create a disincentive for gasoline production, further constraining supply and leading to even higher costs for drivers.
The compromise, , shifts the process to state regulators. Oil refiners will be required to report additional data about their operations and a new watchdog division of the California Energy Commission will investigate alleged price gouging by the industry. That could inform the commission to establish a profit threshold above which companies would be assessed a financial penalty, though the rule-making process is merely authorized by the new law, not mandated.
It will be years before that happens, if it ever does at all. Newsom said today that it will take nine to 12 months to establish the new division of the energy commission. But he insisted that it would be an improvement over his original plan for a windfall profits tax, because of the long-term oversight of the oil industry that it could provide.
鈥淭his is 10x better,鈥� he said. 鈥淭his is more than we even could have imagined in late September when we had the first conversations around this.鈥�
Legislative Democrats raced over the past week to pass the proposal before they leave town at the end of the month for their spring recess, earning howls of disapproval from the oil industry and Republican lawmakers, who argued that the rushed timeline did not allow them to fully vet the bill. Because it was passed through a special session, which the Legislature closed on Monday after , the law takes effect in 90 days.
鈥淭he Governor鈥檚 proposal, modeled after ideas that have empirically failed, will disrupt the energy market and ignore economic reality where ultimately every single Californian will bear the direct as well as the unintended consequences and costs,鈥� Assemblymember , a Republican who represents part of oil-producing Bakersfield, said in a statement.
Slagle of the Western States Petroleum Association said oil refiners take issue with the amount of data they will be required to report, the lack of privacy safeguards for that sensitive information and a provision of the bill that they contend would allow the state to interfere with their maintenance schedules.
If those points are not resolved in follow-up legislation, Slagle said the industry could potentially sue over the law. An unfavorable profit cap rule developed by the California Energy Commission would also be ripe for a legal challenge.
鈥淲e鈥檙e concerned about how that all turns out,鈥� Slagle said. But, he added, with this heavily politicized clash at the Capitol now over, 鈥淲e鈥檙e hopeful that we can shift to having a conversation about the real issue here, which is the supply of fuels.鈥�
Newsom sarcastically dismissed the notion of making the changes that the oil industry is seeking. He said he did not trust the industry鈥檚 talking points, which he characterized as an attempt to push back on an outcome that it does not like.
鈥淲hat are they going to do? Spend some of their billions of dollars, try to go after us, try to demean us, try to lie to you, try to manipulate,鈥� he told reporters. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 status quo here. Give me a break. I鈥檓 just sick and tired of those guys.鈥�
is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.