老夫子传媒

漏 2025 | 老夫子传媒
Southern Oregon University
1250 Siskiyou Blvd.
Ashland, OR 97520
541.552.6301 | 800.782.6191
Listen | Discover | Engage a service of Southern Oregon University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Push to make it even easier to vote in Oregon sparks hot debate

Democrats sit idle on the Oregon House floor as they await confirmation of a quorum with nearly all Republicans absent on Saturday, Sept. 25, 2021.
Sam Stites
Democrats sit idle on the Oregon House floor as they await confirmation of a quorum with nearly all Republicans absent on Saturday, Sept. 25, 2021.

Plan to allow Oregonians to use Social Security numbers in online voting registration forms narrowly passes House vote. It now heads to the Senate for consideration.

A bill making it easier for Oregonians to register to vote online cleared its first hurdle towards becoming law Wednesday, but not without tension.

Members of Oregon鈥檚 House of Representatives approved the new law 33 to 23 with four excused.

What seemed like an innocuous plan to expand ways voters can register became a political proving ground between Republicans and Democrats.

The bill itself is fairly straightforward: those without a driver鈥檚 license or state-issued identification card can now use the last four digits of their Social Security number and submit their signature via the internet to register to vote.

It would also allow third-party organizations approved by the state鈥檚 elections division to submit registration cards on behalf of voters; similar to how organizations currently do when registering people to vote at political rallies or on college campus street corners.

House Majority Leader Julie Fahey, the bill鈥檚 chief sponsor and a Eugene Democrat, said that the intent is to remove barriers for those without DMV-issued identification, many of whom also belong to demographic groups with historically low participation in Oregon鈥檚 electoral process.

That includes veterans, people of color, those with disabilities and low-income individuals.

鈥淥regonians will still have the option of filling out a paper registration form if they don鈥檛 have access to the internet or if that鈥檚 just what they prefer,鈥 Fahey said. 鈥淚 want to be very clear that this bill does not make any changes to any of the existing rules or processes for verifying someone鈥檚 identity or citizenship.鈥

Prior to Wednesday鈥檚 vote, the proposal received backing from institutions and organizations such as Oregon Secretary of State , the of Oregon, and the of Oregon.

But it also received strong opposition from a of Oregonians who argue it opens up the state鈥檚 electoral system to fraud.

That opposition formed the basis for Wednesday鈥檚 floor debate, which saw Republican House members reviving erroneous and repeatedly disprove claims that rampant voter fraud led to Donald Trump鈥檚 loss in the 2020 presidential election and others.

Several prominent members of the House Republican caucus 鈥 including its leader, Prineville Rep. Vikki Breese-Iverson 鈥 have called for 鈥渇orensic鈥 audits of the state鈥檚 2020 election results.

Rep. Daniel Bonham, R-The Dalles, said after reading through much of the testimony submitted on the bill, he concluded the voter registration proposal would invite fraud.

鈥淲e鈥檝e seen the ill effects of ballot harvesting here in Oregon,鈥 he said. 鈥淪o Oregon should certainly not expand our voting registration process to potentially incorporate voter harvesting鈥

Rep. Zach Hudson, D-Troutdale, argued that attempts to besmirch the plan, known as House Bill 4133, were grounded in misinformation and 鈥渇ear-mongering.鈥

鈥淚t has been asked: Why make it easier?鈥 Hudson said. 鈥淏ecause it is our job to make it as easy as possible for our citizens to exercise their constitutional rights.鈥

Rep. Kim Wallan, a Medford Republican and the GOP caucus鈥 second in command, said that her opposition and that of many of her colleagues had less to do with its content and more with the lack of trust between the two parties at this moment.

鈥淥n its face, this bill makes tons of sense,鈥 she said. 鈥淓very discussion point that the Democrats have made is exactly correct: It should be easier. (The current system) is more expensive. It is less likely to result in fraud.

鈥淚f that was all we were talking about,鈥 Wallan continued, 鈥渢hen everyone would vote for this bill. But there鈥檚 so much suspicion and so much mistrust and so many things that get said and thrown around these days, that even something like this, that should just be a simple modernization, isn鈥檛 trusted.鈥

Fahey closed the impassioned debate by saying that those concerned about this bill opening the system to fraud are really stating that they already believe there鈥檚 fraud within Oregon鈥檚 electoral process.

鈥淣ow that鈥檚 become a pretty popular pastime these days in some quarters for folks who actively work to undermine the trust in our election system,鈥 Fahey said. 鈥淔rankly, I think the fall of democracy lies down that road 鈥 not down the road of this bill, which is just allowing people to enter the same information on a screen versus on a piece of paper.鈥

The bill now heads to the Oregon Senate, where it will be considered in committee next week and voted upon shortly after.

The day鈥檚 floor session concluded with an awkward display of sparring between the two parties with each taking the opportunity during the remonstrance period 鈥 a time for lawmakers to give speeches on bills they鈥檙e working on or any other topic of their choice.

Several House members stood to fire negative comments about 鈥渓eadership and courage鈥 toward the opposition, and even members of their own party.

Rep. David Brock Smith, R-Port Orford, went as far as to accuse Hudson of making comments that 鈥渋mpugned half the members of this body.鈥

The drama ended with a call by House Speaker Pro Tempore Paul Holvey, D-Eugene, for members to 鈥渢ake the tone down a little bit.鈥

鈥淚 wish people would take it down a little bit because I don鈥檛 really think it is warranted to escalate this scenario,鈥 Holvey said.

Copyright 2022 Oregon Public Broadcasting. To see more, visit .

Public media is at a critical moment.

Recent threats to federal funding are challenging the way stations like JPR provide service to small communities in rural parts of the country.
Your one-time or sustaining monthly gift is more important than ever.