As the Shasta County recall election approaches, recent board of supervisors meetings have devolved into shouting matches, allegations of misspent funds, and calls for county officials to step down.
A regular lineup of speakers pepper the board with complaints about the county鈥檚 COVID-19 response, a lack of conservatism of members, and frustration over the very rules of public comment during meetings. The board鈥檚 Jan. 18 meeting was held remotely because of threats made against three members.
This tone of politics in Shasta County is setting the stage for the recall election.
鈥淐ertainly not in my career, I started in 2003, and I don鈥檛 know of a recall for a supervisor in Shasta County,鈥� says Shasta County Clerk Cathy Darling Allen.
HOW WE GOT HERE
Next month鈥檚 recall is focused on one supervisor, the representative of District 2, Leonard Moty. He represents a triangle of rural communities west of Redding. Originally last spring, organizers tried to recall three of the five supervisors, but they only collected enough signatures for Moty鈥檚 district.
Members of the group Recall Shasta did not respond to multiple interview requests. But, recent board of supervisors meetings are filled with recall supporters鈥� protests over state vaccine mandates, objections over accepting federal funds, and verbal abuse aimed at officials.
鈥淚t鈥檚 tough to get the work of the people done when you鈥檝e got all these distractions and angst going on,鈥� says Greg Balkovek, a longtime Redding resident.
Balkovek, who says he鈥檚 politically conservative, is the former executive director of United Way of Northern California and a volunteer with the Redding School Board, Chamber of Commerce and Rotary Club. He says the recall effort, which includes a high budget documentary film series, is having an impact on Shasta County.
鈥淭he things that they鈥檝e said and done, with the sophistication that they鈥檙e showing, that they鈥檙e attracting some interest,鈥� he says. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 in the best interest of the county, from my particular perspective.鈥�
The Recall Shasta campaign has been largely funded by a single donor from Connecticut, Reverge Anselmo, who鈥檚 nearly half-a-million dollars in donations vastly overshadows local contributors.
The Shasta County board of supervisors are technically nonpartisan positions, but residents described all five members as Republicans. The members originally targeted by the recall, Mary Rickert, Joe Chimenti, and Leonard Moty, are moderate conservatives. Patrick Jones and Les Baugh are politically farther right. If Moty is removed, the balance will be tipped farther rightward, toward Jones and Baugh who advocated for disobeying California鈥檚 pandemic mandates and who have flaunted COVID safety protocols.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A RECALL
But two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, some question whether recalling a supervisor will have tangible effects or be largely symbolic.
鈥淭hey don鈥檛 control a whole lot on their own because most of their projects and everything is geared by the state and the state funds and the state directs,鈥� says longtime Shasta County resident Archer Pugh, who served as the Redding mayor and a city council member in the 70s and 80s.
鈥淵ou don鈥檛 have a lot of independent leeway,鈥� Pugh says. 鈥淚f you look at the county budget, their general fund budget that they have leeway to play with is very small.鈥�
Pugh, who considers himself a moderate conservative, says the recall is proof of how polarized local politics have become in recent years.
Besides the potential removal of Moty, Supervisors Baugh and Chimenti have announced they won鈥檛 seek reelection when their terms end over the next two years.
AUDITS AND OBSERVERS
With the recall election officially a week away, residents of District 2 have already been sent ballots thanks to California鈥檚 universal vote-by-mail law. Twelve polling places will also be open for in-person voting on election day.
The elections office will do two separate audits before certifying the results, says Clerk Cathy Darling Allen. She says with so much local tension around this election she鈥檚 expecting lots of interest from observers during the vote count.
鈥淲e鈥檙e happy to have folks come in and see what we鈥檙e doing and explain how the process works if people have questions,鈥� she says.
After Feb. 1, elections officials will have 28 days by law to complete the count and certify the results.
