As part of what it described as an ongoing investigation, the California attorney general鈥檚 office has sought answers from OpenAI about its reported plan to convert to a for-profit corporation and how it intends to transfer assets out of its existing nonprofit.
Dec. 6, deputy attorney general Christopher Lamerdin cited clauses in OpenAI鈥檚 articles of incorporation under which 鈥淥penAI鈥檚 assets are irrevocably dedicated to its charitable purpose,鈥� as Lamerdin put it, as well as the office鈥檚 鈥渞esponsibility to protect assets held in charitable trust.鈥� In addition to asking about asset transfers, it sought information on OpenAI鈥檚 restructuring plan and the value of its assets.
The attorney鈥檚 general鈥檚 office told CalMatters in an email, 鈥淭he Department of Justice is committed to protecting charitable assets for their intended purpose and takes this responsibility seriously.鈥�
The letter asked for a response from OpenAI by Jan. 8. Asked if the attorney general received such a response, a spokesperson wrote, 鈥淭o protect its integrity, we鈥檙e unable to comment on an ongoing investigation.鈥�
"The Department of Justice is committed to protecting charitable assets for their intended purpose and takes this responsibility seriously."Office of Attorney General Rob Bonta
OpenAI did not answer questions on the record about the letter or its structure as an organization.
Allowing nonprofit OpenAI to repurpose its assets to earn a profit and attract investors could set a dangerous precedent, critics argue, allowing startups to enjoy the tax writeoffs of nonprofits even when they intend to eventually become highly lucrative, capitalist enterprises.
The debate over OpenAI鈥檚 business restructure comes at a time when the company is attempting to grow its influence. OpenAI increased spending on last year, and for the to oppose bills to regulate AI in Sacramento.
In September, Reuters of its core business from its nonprofit to a for-profit public benefit corporation. In November, Bloomberg with California鈥檚 attorney general over the shift.
The company that it was considering a new structure and planned to set up a for-profit public benefit corporation, although it stopped short of saying it planned to move control into the for-profit entity.
OpenAI was founded in late 2015 with the backing of 鈥溾�� members like LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Originally a nonprofit focused on benefiting humanity through research into , it created a for-profit arm to appear more attractive to investors and pour billions of dollars into computing resources in order to train powerful AI systems. Profits flowing to that part of the company and its investors are to fundraising. A dispute between the nonprofit and for-profit arms of OpenAI broke into the open in late 2023 following an to oust co-founder and CEO Sam Altman, which led to an ultimatum from a majority of employees, who threatened to quit if Altman was not reinstated.
Since then, OpenAI closed a $6.6 billion funding round and, earlier this week, alongside President Trump in the White House, announced the , a $500 billion joint venture to build data centers and energy infrastructure that companies like OpenAI say is necessary to train large AI models.
California鈥檚 attorney general, Rob Bonta, on Dec. 12 was urged in a letter from , according to the Wall Street Journal, with Meta arguing that such a precedent could have 鈥渟eismic implications for Silicon Valley鈥� by allowing startups to enjoy privileged nonprofit tax status until they begin making money. Musk has as part of a lawsuit against OpenAI .
After the OpenAI nonprofit board fired Altman in 2023, nonprofit consumer advocacy group Public Citizen repeatedly argued in letters to attorneys general in California, where OpenAI is based, and Delaware, where OpenAI filed articles of incorporation, that they should investigate the organization. Public Citizen Co-President Robert Weissman wrote that OpenAI was not operating like a nonprofit, should lose its nonprofit status and be forced to operate as a for-profit business, and that any for-profit entity assuming control of OpenAI should pay a premium for that control to a nonprofit entirely separate from OpenAI.
The precedent for this approach comes from Blue Cross of California, which, following a transfer of assets to a for-profit subsidiary in the 1990s, .
It鈥檚 tough to say precisely how much such a premium is worth when it comes to OpenAI, but a day before OpenAI鈥檚 $6 billion funding round last October, Weissman estimated it鈥檚 worth .
The Stargate Project, Weissman told CalMatters, 鈥渋s more evidence that the OpenAI nonprofit doesn鈥檛 really exist as an independent body, that the OpenAI nonprofit board is not exerting any meaningful authority over the for profit, and isn鈥檛 even taking seriously its nonprofit mission.鈥�
Weissman wants to see the attorney general investigate how much of a premium a for-profit OpenAI would need to pay and how that valuation relates to intellectual property owned by OpenAI and companies and subsidiaries tied to OpenAI.
鈥淭he California attorney general鈥檚 office is a serious regulator of nonprofits, and there鈥檚 no way that this scale spin off from a nonprofit is going to take place without careful review by the California attorney general,鈥� Weissman told CalMatters. 鈥淲e鈥檙e hopeful they arrive at conclusions that track [with] what we鈥檝e been arguing over the last year and a half.鈥�
Levi Sumagaysay contributed to this story.