Ballot Measure 114 did not become law today.
The Oregon Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a state Department of Justice petition asking the court to throw out a lower court鈥檚 temporary restraining order blocking the law from taking effect.
Harney County Circuit Court Judge Robert Raschio issued the order Tuesday, saying the law violated the Oregon state constitution鈥檚 right to bear arms. Raschio said Oregonians would be 鈥渦nable to lawfully purchase a firearm or bear a magazine capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition in the State of Oregon.鈥�
His order is temporary to allow time for a more careful hearing scheduled for next week.
Voters approved Measure 114 in November. It would ban the manufacture, purchase or sale of magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. It also requires people take a safety course and pass a background check to get a permit allowing them to purchase a firearm.
The law closes the so-called 鈥淐harleston Loophole,鈥� a gap in federal law that allows firearms to be transferred to a person after three days if a background check is not complete. If enacted, the new law would require a completed background check before a firearm can be transferred.
On Wednesday morning, state Justice Department lawyers filed a petition asking the Oregon Supreme Court to review the Harney County ruling and vacate the lower court鈥檚 decision.
鈥淭he people of Oregon enacted Measure 114 to prevent 鈥榟orrific deaths and devastating injuries due to mass shootings, homicides and suicides,鈥欌�� the state wrote in its motion to halt the circuit court鈥檚 proceedings. 鈥淒oing so fell well within the wide latitude provided by Article I, section 27, which, as this Court has repeatedly indicated, allows the people to take such reasonable measures to protect and promote public safety.鈥�
In response, lawyers for the gun rights group Gun Owners of America and the other plaintiffs said these new provisions present 鈥渟everal novel legal questions under Oregon law, the legality of which should be determined through the usual procedures including the development of a full and complete record in circuit court, an appeal to the Oregon Court of Appeals and, if this Court agrees to hear the case, a decision by this Court.鈥�
Gun Owners of America positions itself as a 鈥渘o compromise鈥� gun rights organization and criticizes the National Rifle Association for being too soft on gun issues.
The end-of-day order from the state Supreme Court allowing the lower court鈥檚 ruling to stand, briefly closes out a flurry of legal activity in the days leading up to the Dec. 8 deadline when the law was slated to go into effect. Hours before Raschio鈥檚 order came down, a federal judge had denied a request for a temporary restraining order that would have blocked the law. The federal judge eventually applied that ruling to all four federal lawsuits challenging the new restrictions.
None of this week鈥檚 decisions are final. In federal court, U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut plans to hear arguments on whether to grant a preliminary injunction against the new law.
In state court, Raschio has scheduled more in depth arguments for Dec. 13 to consider a preliminary injunction against the law.
Copyright 2022 Oregon Public Broadcasting. To see more, visit .
