老夫子传媒

漏 2024 | 老夫子传媒
Southern Oregon University
1250 Siskiyou Blvd.
Ashland, OR 97520
541.552.6301 | 800.782.6191
Listen | Discover | Engage a service of Southern Oregon University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Tribal elders ask US Supreme Court to hear case over a desecrated site on Mount Hood

Carol Logan, a member of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, Wilbur Slockish, hereditary chief of the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, and Johnny Jackson, hereditary chief of the Cascade Tribe at Enola Hill, a sacred Native American site in the mountains near Mount Hood.
Becket Fund for Religious Liberty
Carol Logan, a member of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, Wilbur Slockish, hereditary chief of the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, and Johnny Jackson, hereditary chief of the Cascade Tribe at Enola Hill, a sacred Native American site in the mountains near Mount Hood.

The Yakama and Grand Ronde tribes are asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on their claim that an expansion of Highway 26 in 2008 violated their religious freedom by destroying an ancient burial site, a stone altar and old-growth trees.

Tribal elders Wilbur Slockish and Carol Logan say a forested site off U.S. Highway 26 on Mount Hood was like a church without walls.

They鈥檝e told judges in district and circuit courts that they would visit the sacred burial ground to remember their ancestors and pray to their creator near a stone altar surrounded by old growth trees.

The site, known as Ana Kwna Nchi Nchi Patat, which means 鈥淧lace of Big Big Trees,鈥 was destroyed by a highway expansion project in 2008.

Slockish, the hereditary chief of the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, and Logan, a member of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, sued the agencies involved in the highway project, saying the bulldozing of the site violated their rights to religious freedom.

But dismissed their case, so to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Tribal elders, left to right: Wilbur Slockish, Carol Logan and Johnny Jackson, right. Jackson was a plaintiff in a 2008 lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Transportation over damage to a sacred site along U.S. Highway 26 on Mount Hood. He died in 2020.
Courtesy of Becket Fund for Religious Liberty /
Tribal elders, left to right: Wilbur Slockish, Carol Logan and Johnny Jackson, right. Jackson was a plaintiff in a 2008 lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Transportation over damage to a sacred site along U.S. Highway 26 on Mount Hood. He died in 2020.


In filed this month, the tribal members say they told state and federal transportation officials about the religious value of the site before the agencies started building a left-turn lane off the highway about 13 miles from Government Camp.

The highway expansion happened anyway, removing trees and a stone altar, and covering the burial grounds with a large embankment. The U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Land Management and Oregon Department of Transportation said the turn lane was needed for safety following nearby traffic accidents, one of which was fatal.

Slockish and Logan took the agencies to court, arguing the destruction of the site violated their rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which prohibits state and federal agencies from burdening a person鈥檚 exercise of religion, and the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution, which protects the right to practice religion.

They want the federal agencies to remove the embankment, replant trees and allow the stone altar to be reconstructed.

鈥淲e鈥檝e always taken care of this land, taken care of our burial sites, because that鈥檚 what we were charged with by our creator 鈥 to make sure they weren鈥檛 disturbed,鈥 Slockish said in a . 鈥淭o me, it鈥檚 like them going into the Catholic church or the Protestant church and cutting their altar.鈥

Luke Goodrich, an attorney with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, is representing the tribal members, as well as Cascade Geographic Society and Mount Hood Sacred Lands Preservation Alliance, as plaintiffs in the case.

He said the case was put on hold for years while the parties tried to negotiate a settlement, but that effort stalled.

After the in 2008, a district court decided that the highway project did not put a meaningful burden on the tribal members鈥 religious freedom. That ruling was appealed, and as moot after finding the Oregon Department of Transportation would be responsible for restoring the site but had been dismissed as a defendant in 2012.

Appealing the case to the federal Supreme Court is a last resort for tribal members who want to see the site restored, Goodrich said.

鈥淩eligious freedom in this country means the government tries to do whatever it can to refrain from prohibiting your religious practices,鈥 he said. 鈥淭he question in this case is will Native Americans receive the same kind of legal protection for their religious practices that everybody else in the country already gets.鈥

The U.S. Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Transportation declined to comment.

The Supreme Court will decide by January whether it will hear the case.

OPB reporter Bradley Parks contributed to this report.

Copyright 2022 Oregon Public Broadcasting. To see more, visit .