老夫子传媒

漏 2025 | 老夫子传媒
Southern Oregon University
1250 Siskiyou Blvd.
Ashland, OR 97520
541.552.6301 | 800.782.6191
Listen | Discover | Engage a service of Southern Oregon University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Fund the police: Newsom responds to California crime concerns

The windows of the Dior store in Union Square in San Francisco were boarded up as of Nov. 25, 2021. Videos on social media showed masked people running with goods from several high-end retailers in the storied shopping area. Photo by Samuel Rigelhaupt / Sipa USA
Samuel Rigelhaupt/Samuel Rigelhaupt / Sipa USA via
/
X07185
The windows of the Dior store in Union Square in San Francisco were boarded up as of Nov. 25, 2021. Videos on social media showed masked people running with goods from several high-end retailers in the storied shopping area. Photo by Samuel Rigelhaupt / Sipa USA

Gov. Newsom puts on a tough face about California crime, defends past reforms and proposes $350 million-plus to stop organized retail thefts.

When it comes to law and order, Gov. Gavin Newsom wants California voters to know that he feels your pain 鈥 no matter what the statistics say.

Newsom to spend more than $350 million to ramp up crime-fighting efforts, with the bulk of that cash set aside to help local law enforcement agencies crack down on 鈥渙rganized retail theft.鈥

The governor is responding to a raft of that struck retailers in the San Francisco and Los Angeles areas 鈥 and that inspired a cascade of headlines about out-of-control crime.

Today鈥檚 announcement is the latest indication that on crime, even as they defend a decade鈥檚 worth of reforms aimed at making the criminal justice system less punitive and discriminatory.

鈥淲e鈥檙e not walking back on our commitment in this state to advance comprehensive reforms,鈥 the governor said at a press conference at a California Highway Patrol post in Dublin. 鈥淏ut we also have to recognize this moment we鈥檙e in. We have to recognize people鈥檚 fears and anxieties.鈥

Indeed, Newsom stressed that his announcement was motivated more by growing public concern about crime than the crime itself.

鈥淚 could regale you with facts,鈥 the governor said, noting that despite an apparent increase this year, crime remains at a relative historical low across the state. Earlier this week the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California reported that in Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco and Oakland. The rates are now roughly 鈥渟imilar to pre-pandemic levels.鈥

鈥淪tats mean nothing in terms of your feelings,鈥 the governor said.

Newsom went to special lengths to defend Proposition 47 in particular. The 2014 voter-backed initiative reduced penalties for certain low-level offenses, including theft and shoplifting of less than $950, from felonies to misdemeanors. For nearly a decade, conservatives have predicted that the loosened rules would result in a crime wave. Last year, tough-on-crime activists, along with California鈥檚 retailers, put a measure on the ballot to ratchet some of those penalties back up. The .

鈥淪tats mean nothing in terms of your feelings.鈥
GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM, ANNOUNCING A $350 MILLION-PLUS ANTI-CRIME PACKAGE

But the latest series of high-profile shoplifting raids has revived that debate. Today鈥檚 announcement was applauded by the California Retailers Association. 鈥淲e need to send a message to these theft rings that California will not tolerate organized crime,鈥 association president Rachel Michelin said in a press release.

Senate Republican leader Scott Wilk of Santa Clarita said in a statement: 鈥淚t shouldn鈥檛 have taken increasing homicide rates, widespread news reports of smash-and-grabs, and pleas from Californians for Democrats to come to this realization.鈥

Palmdale Republican Tom Lackey, vice chairperson of the Assembly Public Safety Committee, called the announcement 鈥渢oo little, too late.鈥 He also lambasted the Democrats as 鈥渢he party of defunding the police.鈥

Heading into an election year, Newsom鈥檚 budget proposal, most of which would provide additional funding to police and prosecutors, appears intended to leave voters with the opposite impression. Similarly, earlier this week, elected Democratic leaders in proposed spending more on police overtime.

If the Democratic Legislature approves :

  • $255 million in grants would go to local law enforcement agencies over the next three years to combat organized retail crime;
  • $30 million would go to local district attorneys over three years , and $18 million would create a new statewide anti-theft team at the attorney general鈥檚 office;
  • $25 million would fund local gun buy-back programs;
  • $20 million would assist the National Guard to intercept fentanyl and other drugs at the Mexico border; 
  • Some money would be reserved to cover uninsured losses of small businesses that have been ransacked by thieves. The written plan doesn鈥檛 specify an amount, but Newsom pegged it at $20 million.

The package will be included in the budget proposal that Newsom will unveil early next month.

Assembly Budget Chairperson Phil Ting, a San Francisco Democrat, welcomed the package, saying in a press release that looked forward to 鈥渢eaming up with the Administration and our law enforcement partners on crafting an effective strategy to stop these sophisticated shoplifting rings.鈥

Standing beside Newsom at the press conference was Attorney General Rob Bonta. Newsom as the state鈥檚 top law enforcement officer in March, plucking him from the Assembly where he was one of the body鈥檚 most liberal members on criminal justice issues.

Opposition to crime is a bipartisan instinct, Bonta said today. 鈥淚鈥檝e not met anyone who wants to be a victim of crime 鈥 Republican, Democrat, it doesn鈥檛 matter.鈥

Newsom also restated that would allow California citizens to sue manufacturers and distributors of .

That proposal is designed to be a that gives citizens the right to sue anyone who 鈥溾 someone in getting an abortion. The U.S. Supreme Court recently , effectively permitting a legislative end-run around what was believed to be a constitutionally protected right under its 1973 Roe v Wade decision.

鈥淚t is a Pandora鈥檚 box,鈥 Newsom said of the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision not to immediately strike down the Texas law. But, he added, 鈥渢o the extent this decision is used to put womens鈥 lives at risk, we鈥檙e going to use this decision to save people鈥檚 lives by addressing the issue of gun violence here in the state of California.鈥

 is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics. 

Public media is at a critical moment.

Recent threats to federal funding are challenging the way stations like JPR provide service to small communities in rural parts of the country.
Your one-time or sustaining monthly gift is more important than ever.