老夫子传媒

漏 2025 | 老夫子传媒
Southern Oregon University
1250 Siskiyou Blvd.
Ashland, OR 97520
541.552.6301 | 800.782.6191
Listen | Discover | Engage a service of Southern Oregon University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

California could be the first state in the country to ban some much debated food additives

A woman holds a melting popsicle as she sits in shade along Mission Bay, Friday, Sept. 2, 2022, in San Diego. Two California lawmakers introduced a bill that would ban some chemicals found in grocery items like candies, drinks and popsicles.
Gregory Bull
/
AP Photo
A woman holds a melting popsicle as she sits in shade along Mission Bay, Friday, Sept. 2, 2022, in San Diego. Two California lawmakers introduced a bill that would ban some chemicals found in grocery items like candies, drinks and popsicles.

Two California legislators are moving forward with an effort to ban five chemicals that are present in many foods in the United States, contending the chemicals are unsafe and are and other countries.

With their proposed , Assemblymembers Jesse Gabriel (D-Encino) and Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland) are leading the charge for California to prohibit the manufacture or distribution of foods containing the additives red dye No. 3, titanium dioxide, potassium bromate, brominated vegetable oil and propyl paraben.

The chemicals have been the subject of controversy over the years but are in foods that are widely distributed in this country, especially in candies, drinks and baked goods that are marketed to children, .

鈥淲e don't love our kids any less here in the state of California than they do in Europe,鈥 said Gabriel during a press conference Tuesday. 鈥淎nd we need to take the same steps to protect our kids.鈥

Gabriel added that the current system the U.S. Food and Drug Administration uses has a loophole that permits companies to add ingredients to food that haven鈥檛 been properly vetted. FDA rules allow companies to as 鈥済enerally recognized as safe鈥 or GRAS and effectively bypass federal safety checks.

The lawmakers said they鈥檇 selected the top five worst chemicals still in distribution 鈥 ones that have been , and harm to the .

In 1990, the additive red dye No. 3 was because it caused thyroid cancer in rats at high doses. A variant of the chemical was also banned in foods. But according to the nonpartisan, nonprofit Environmental Working Group, red dye No. 3 is still currently 鈥 in

Michael Hansen, Senior Scientist for Consumer Reports, says that while the FDA had said it would put further regulations on red dye No. 3 when it banned it from cosmetics, it never did. He attributes the lack of movement to increasing deregulation and a lack of pressure from within and outside the federal agency.

In October 2022, Consumer Reports, the Center for Science in the Public Interest and 22 other groups and individuals to the FDA petitioning to 鈥渞emove Red No. 3 from the permanent list of color additives approved for use in food and dietary supplements 鈥 and for use in ingested drugs 鈥 because the FDA has found that the additive induces cancer and is unsafe.鈥

In the past, industry groups that there鈥檚 insufficient scientific evidence linking synthetic colors to negative health or behavior effects.

The FDA says it does not comment on proposed or pending legislation, but that it 鈥渨ill continue to engage in the scientific and regulatory review of color additives鈥痑nd鈥痑ct鈥痺hen necessary to ensure that the products marketed to consumers are safe and properly labeled.鈥

If the proposed legislation is signed into law, companies will be forced to use alternatives deemed safer in the production of their goods for distribution in California.

Copyright 2023 CapRadio

Public media is at a critical moment.

Recent threats to federal funding are challenging the way stations like JPR provide service to small communities in rural parts of the country.
Your one-time or sustaining monthly gift is more important than ever.