Oregon Senate Republicans are questioning whether the state鈥檚 environmental agency has authority to re-create and implement a program that would drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel companies, a task those lawmakers said should be taken up by the Legislature instead.
In a letter addressed to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality on , nine Senate Republicans outlined their concerns about rising electricity rates and a potential connection to the state鈥檚 Climate Protection Program. They also questioned whether DEQ has the authority to create and implement the program 鈥� after the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled the agency鈥檚 first attempt invalid.
鈥淲e believe it鈥檚 an error for DEQ to fire up this program,鈥� state Sen. Lynn Findley, R-Vale, said. 鈥淚 would hope that they would want to sit down, have some conversation between the legislative branch and the administrative branch, and talk about paths forward.鈥�
In their letter, the Senate Republicans shared 鈥渄eep concern鈥� about the program and claimed that its previous implementation has contributed to Oregonians鈥� rising electricity costs. Six of those lawmakers are in their final terms, barred from.
鈥淎nyone that thinks that all these increased costs and programmed operations will be borne by the utility or borne by the industry is living in an alternative world, because they will pass all of those costs on to consumers,鈥� said Findley, who is among the Republicans not allowed to run for reelection. 鈥淎ny increased cost [to] utilities, or any company that has to comply with the Climate Protection Program, will be passed on 100% to the consumers.鈥�
Findley said the program is partially to blame for the current surge in electricity rates 鈥� a claim that environmental regulators dispute.
鈥淪o far this program hasn鈥檛 cost the utilities anything,鈥� said Lauren Wirtis, DEQ鈥檚 communications and outreach manager.
Energy and gas rates have steadily increased over the past five years,.
If the Climate Protection Program had been implemented as intended earlier, fossil fuel companies would have been allowed to purchase carbon credits, each worth one ton of emissions. The funds collected would have gone toward programs benefiting communities most impacted by climate change.
鈥淲e didn鈥檛 get a chance to implement that program before, so nobody paid into that either,鈥� Wirtis said.
In his criticism of the Climate Protection Program, Findley also said DEQ created the program 鈥渋n a vacuum鈥� and did not have adequate public participation, and he argued that it should have been drafted by lawmakers, not bureaucrats
The program was created under an executive order by former Gov. Kate Brown. Brown directed state agencies to develop rules that would limit and reduce fossil fuel emissions. The executive order came after state legislators failed to pass a cap-and-trade program that would reduce the state鈥檚 overall greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to human-caused climate change.
鈥淭he correct solution would be to have the Legislature do it and, and DEQ to write rules on how to implement it,鈥� Findley said.
Senate Republicans walked out two years in a row to prevent a quorum that would have allowed majority Democrats from voting on several bills,
鈥淪enate Democrats are confident that the Department of Environmental Quality is responsibly putting programs in place to limit toxic pollution and modernize Oregon鈥檚 energy production,鈥� Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber, D-Beaverton & Southwest Portland, said in an email to OPB.
鈥淭he clean energy transition is happening because it is a safer, more sustainable investment for our economy and our communities,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e can either lead the way or get left behind.鈥�
Rebooting Oregon鈥檚 flagship climate response
Currently, the Climate Protection Program is. The program aimed to reduce fossil fuel emissions from oil and gas companies by 90% by 2050.
It was first implemented in 2022, and at the time was one of the strongest climate protection programs in the nation. But fossil fuel companies sued in March 2022, arguing DEQ exceeded its authority when it created the program鈥檚 rules. A that the state鈥檚 first attempt was invalid, saying DEQ failed to comply with disclosure of the .
DEQ鈥檚 Wirtis said the agency is confident that it has the full authority to re-create and implement the program and appreciates the feedback it continues to receive.
鈥淭he Legislature gave authority and direction to the agency to reduce air contaminants, which includes greenhouse gas emissions,鈥� she said.
During the first rulemaking process, Wirtis said, the public process lasted over 18 months and DEQ received more than 7,000 comments.
In the second round, Wirtis said, DEQ is committed to learning what worked and what didn鈥檛 work.
The previous implementation of the program also accrued no costs from regulated fossil fuel companies, she said.
Wirtis said the agency is preparing to release a draft of the new Climate Protection Program rules soon, which will be open for public comment.
DEQ鈥檚 Environmental Quality Commission will vote on the new rules by the end of the year.
If passed, the new program鈥檚 implementation would begin in 2025.
Copyright 2024 Oregon Public Broadcasting
