The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management announced last month it was moving forward with plans for off Coos Bay and Brookings. As a first step, the agency said on Feb.14 it would conduct an environmental assessment and gave the public 30 days to comment. The comment period ends on Friday.
Oregon鈥檚 U.S. Sens. Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley and U.S. Rep. Val Hoyle, all Democrats, said residents need more time according to input they鈥檝e received. on Tuesday, they asked the agency鈥檚 director, Elizabeth Klein, to extend the comment period to give Oregonians who would be affected by the offshore sites a chance to fully engage in the process.
鈥淭ribes, the fishing community and others throughout Oregon鈥檚 coastal communities are currently working to develop comments that will inform the environmental assessment for the wind energy areas, including impacts to the ocean ecosystem, environment, fisheries, viewsheds and other important resources,鈥� they said. 鈥淲e request an extension of the comment period to allow for robust comments that will set the most complete stage for future analysis. We believe that an extension will serve the tribes, coastal and fishing communities, and ultimately BOEM by allowing ample time to prepare meaningful scoping comments.鈥�
The sites are part of the Biden administration鈥檚 plan to build up 15 gigawatts of floating offshore wind energy capacity by 2035, with a total of 30 gigawatts deployed by 2030. Oregon and California on the West Coast are among nearly nationwide 鈥� including states on the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean 鈥� that the bureau is working with to develop wind energy sites. , the agency had approved six sites, all on the East Coast. The most recent approval was to power 700,000 homes in New York and New Jersey.
Last year, the Bureau of Ocean Energy and Management gave Oregonians several months to comment on the agency鈥檚 plans, and nearly 1,000 people weighed in. Agency officials also visited Brookings, Gold Beach and Coos Bay last fall to talk to fishing groups, officials and residents about installing wind turbines offshore. But those meetings did not give everyone who would be affected by the installations enough time for 鈥渁 full and healthy exchange of ideas and concerns,鈥� the letter said.
Electric utilities favor the installation of wind power sites off Oregon to help them meet the state鈥檚 electricity needs and climate goals by reducing emissions. Wind power is currently the second cleanest energy source in Oregon after hydropower and makes up nearly 12% of Oregon鈥檚 electricity generation and accounts for nearly 5% of the state鈥檚 energy consumption, according to .
The two wind energy areas would add 2.4 gigawatts of clean power 鈥� enough to power about 830,000 homes 鈥� with the installations covering more than 195,000 acres in total. The Coos Bay site would span about 61,200 acres and be located more than 30 miles from shore, while the Brookings site would cover about 133,808 acres and float about 20 miles from shore.
Bureau officials said in developing plans for sites nationwide, it maps where the strongest winds are; the location of shipping lanes, undersea cables and submerged platforms; areas where commercial and recreational fishing are concentrated; areas that are home to wildlife and fragile habitat; and the impact on views.
Still, some fishing groups and tribes are against the development of wind energy in the area. Trawlers are worried the sites could affect their livelihood by restricting trawling, and local tribal members whose ancestors have lived along the southern Oregon coast for centuries are also worried about fishing. In November, the Tribal Council of the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians saying it opposes offshore wind energy development because the agency had failed to respond to its concerns.
鈥淭he tribe has consistently raised concerns about wind energy development. These comments include a request that important, cultural viewsheds be excluded from the (wind energy sites) and that wind development avoid areas critical to resident and migratory species, including important areas for fishing,鈥� the council said.
How to comment
Oregonians can comment through Friday on the proposed sites by
The is a professional, nonprofit news organization. We are an affiliate of , a national 501(c)(3) nonprofit supported by grants and a coalition of donors and readers. The Capital Chronicle retains full editorial independence, meaning decisions about news and coverage are made by Oregonians for Oregonians.