More farmland across the U.S. will need to host power-generating solar panels for the country to decarbonize the electric grid and meet targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, according to the U.S. Departments of Energy and Agriculture.
But that鈥檚 not the sell that officials at the USDA鈥檚 Rural Development office use to entice Oregon farmers and rural business owners to get onboard.
鈥淲e estimate that our customers are saving between 40% and 100% on their electricity bills,鈥� said Margaret Hoffman, Oregon director for the rural development office.
Those customers are farmers and small business owners across the state who鈥檝e applied for historic federal funding to put solar panels on their land and businesses through the Rural Energy for America Program. It鈥檚 been around since 2008 but received a record $1 billion in funding as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, passed by Congress in 2022. It is now, according to Hoffmann, the single largest investment in rural electrification since the 1930s, and farmers and business owners are eager to jump on it.
鈥淲e鈥檝e seen a huge uptick of interest in the program,鈥� Hoffman said.
In the last year the office has invested more than in rural Oregon. But challenges with a lack of transmission for the electricity, and a lack of local technical assistance 鈥� including help applying for grants to offset the cost of solar installations 鈥� remain. Hoffman, who previously served as energy policy advisor for former Oregon Govs. John Kitzhaber and Kate Brown, said it鈥檚 something she鈥檚 trying to champion as demand for solar in rural Oregon grows.
Small scale
Hoffman said solar installations that provide community-level energy are the 鈥渂read and butter鈥� of the federal rural energy program.
Big solar installations, like in the Willamette Valley, have drawn more criticism or concern in rural communities. The Muddy Creek project in Linn County would cover 1,100 acres. The Rural Energy for America program funds projects that wouldn鈥檛 require more than a few acres and is geared at smaller solar installations that can provide clean power directly to businesses and neighboring homes.
Hoffman said projects can be everything from solar panels on a production facility that cut energy costs, to solar panels on a barn or in a field that can in turn help reduce the high costs of pumping water for farm irrigation.
One smaller grant recipient, Trail Distilling in Oregon City, got $73,000 to help pay for roof-mounted solar panels that have brought its energy bills down to about $13 per month, Hoffman said. A $1 million grant to fund a community solar project on city-owned industrial property in Ontario in eastern Oregon is slated to save the city more than $50,000 per year in reduced energy costs.
Challenges
Critics of the proposed Muddy Creek solar installation on Willamette Valley farmland have said solar developments should happen in eastern Oregon, where there is more abundant and less fertile land. But electric transmission lines from the east part of the state to the west are still underdeveloped, and much of the land is owned by the federal government, which makes siting for solar development difficult.
鈥淚f you look at the eastern part of the state, there鈥檚 a lot of Bureau of Land Management land, there鈥檚 a lot of Forest Service land, and some of that land has heightened protection because it鈥檚 either sage grouse territory or there鈥檚 a threatened plant species or something like that,鈥� Hoffman said. Siting on federal lands, which includes undergoing a rigorous environmental impact assessment, can cost millions.
Then, there鈥檚 the cost of building the grid that鈥檚 needed to transmit the electricity. New transmission lines cost about $1 million per mile to build.
鈥淪o if you have to build a project that鈥檚 15 miles away from the nearest transmission line, you just added $15 million to your costs,鈥� she said.
On top of that, some large utilities charge a 鈥渨heeling fee鈥� 鈥� essentially charging solar developers and producers a fee for using any part of the utilities鈥� transmission lines to transfer energy to the utilities鈥� customers.
These more expensive issues aside, Hoffman said the greatest challenge is helping farmers and business owners ask for the federal money they need to develop solar on their own lands.
鈥淚 think that the biggest challenge that we see is that an agricultural producer and a small business owner need technical assistance in order to write the grant and get all of the materials that are required to access the federal funding together,鈥� Hoffman said. 鈥淎ny investments we can be making in technical assistance increases the equitable access to our program.鈥�
The is a professional, nonprofit news organization. We are an affiliate of , a national 501(c)(3) nonprofit supported by grants and a coalition of donors and readers. The Capital Chronicle retains full editorial independence, meaning decisions about news and coverage are made by Oregonians for Oregonians.