老夫子传媒

漏 2024 | 老夫子传媒
Southern Oregon University
1250 Siskiyou Blvd.
Ashland, OR 97520
541.552.6301 | 800.782.6191
Listen | Discover | Engage a service of Southern Oregon University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Oregon Legislature passes ban on foam food containers

FILE: A Styrofoam container is shown with take out food.
Manuel Balce Ceneta
FILE: A Styrofoam container is shown with take out food.

The bill bans food vendors from serving meals in containers made of polystyrene foam, commonly known as Styrofoam. It also prohibits businesses from using or selling foam packing peanuts or single-use foam coolers.

Restaurants throughout Oregon will need to ditch to-go containers made of plastic foam by 2025, under a bill headed to Gov. Tina Kotek鈥檚 desk.

Senate Bill 543, long a priority for Oregon environmental groups, cleared the state House on a 40-18 vote Wednesday. The bill bans food vendors from serving meals in containers made of polystyrene foam, commonly known as Styrofoam. It also prohibits businesses from using or selling foam packing peanuts or single-use foam coolers. The Senate in early April.

Nine cities in Oregon, including Ashland and Medford, already have local policies prohibiting foam containers, but SB 543鈥瞫 advocates say a blanket ban is needed. They note that foam products aren鈥檛 accepted by curbside recycling programs, are often littered and break easily down into small pieces that are difficult to pick up.

鈥淲hether along a river, a highway or our beautiful beaches, single-use plastics are the predominant waste we clean up,鈥 said state Rep. Maxine Dexter, D-Portland, a chief sponsor of the bill. 鈥淚t鈥檚 everywhere, it鈥檚 ugly and it鈥檚 doing harm.鈥

SB 543 also bans vendors from using containers that include what are known as PFAS, the so-called 鈥渇orever chemicals鈥 that can make material like cardboard resistant to grease. PFAS don鈥檛 and have been some cancers, high cholesterol and decreases in infant birth weight.

The bill imposes fines ranging from $100 to $500 a day for those who distribute banned products. It does not affect the use of some Styrofoam containers, including the packaging used to ship and store food that has not been prepared to eat, like egg cartons.

Oregon environmental organizations have pushed a Styrofoam packaging ban for years. In 2019, a similar bill appeared likely to succeed, but wound up getting shot down when some moderate Democrats joined Republicans in opposition. The makeup of both chambers is far different today, and HB 543 had a comparably easy path, winning bipartisan majorities in both chambers.

鈥淭his bill is a feel-good bill that protects our environment, and it鈥檚 an easy bill to vote yes on,鈥 state Rep. Virgil Osborne, R-Roseburg, said Wednesday. Osborne nevertheless cautioned that Oregon needs to ensure foam packaging is replaced by containers that are less environmentally harmful.

Restaurant and grocer groups were neutral on SB 543, but the bill has seen opposition from industry groups. They argued a ban would add another unneeded layer of regulation onto a 2021 law that will require producers of plastic packaging to take responsibility for their products 鈥 and fund programs to safely dispose of them.

If Kotek signs the bill, Oregon will join eight other states, including , that ban some foam containers.

The House on Wednesday also passed SB 545, which directs the Oregon Health Authority to create rules that give restaurants the option of accepting reusable containers when packaging food to-go. The bill is designed to further reduce the use of single-use plastic packaging.

Dirk VanderHart covers Oregon politics and government for Oregon Public Broadcasting, a JPR news partner. His reporting comes to JPR through the Northwest News Network, a collaboration between public media organizations in Oregon and Washington.