The Oregon legislature recently adjourned for the year, leaving some unfinished business when it comes to a state forest that鈥檚 been the subject of controversy. Conservation groups expressed dismay last year when state officials decided to sell parts of the Elliott State Forest to timber companies.
The legislature had the opportunity to shape the future of the forest. But with no action on three different bills, its fate is still far from decided. To get an update on what鈥檚 happening, JPR鈥檚 Liam Moriarty spoke with Jes Burns, of our EarthFix environmental reporting team.
Hi Jes.
Hi, Liam.
Let鈥檚 start at the top; what is the Elliott State Forest and how is it different from other state lands?
The Elliott is a coastal forest right outside Coos Bay. It鈥檚 a little larger in acreage than the city of Portland. And about half the trees there are more than 100 years old, some are much older, so some prime wildlife habitat.
What makes it different is how it鈥檚 managed. It鈥檚 part of the Common School Fund. The federal government gave the forest to the state about a century ago. Part of that deal required Oregon to make as much money for public education as possible off the land. And it was big money-maker for decades 鈥� between 1960 and 2000, timber sales generated about $400 million for schools.
Not bad. So then why would the state decide to sell off parts of the forest?
It鈥檚 really just the same story of timber production in the Northwest鈥� In the 90s, the spotted owl and another forest-dwelling bird, the marbled murrlet, got protection under the Endangered Species Act. And a few years later, coho salmon were listed. Timber sales slowed before coming to a halt with some litigation in 2013.
And that meant the forest was actually losing money because the state still had to pay for things like fire protection. I spoke with John Potter, a policy advisor with the Department of State Lands. He told me this put the state in a tenuous position.
John Potter: 鈥淭hey鈥檙e like endowment lands that really should be generating revenue. If not, the education beneficiaries potentially have a beef with the Land Board in not meeting that trust mandate that they have. If the Land Board continues to lose money on the property, then it鈥檚 open to challenge.鈥�
So the State Land Board sold about 1500 acres to timber companies to cover their losses and their legal obligations. And this really created a lot of indignation from public lands advocates.
Are more sales planned?
Well not the same kind of sale that happened last year. After the uproar, the State Land Board decided last December to float a few new options. These are things like cutting costs by contracting someone else to manage the forest, completing a habitat conservation plan to allow timber sales to resume, or finding another public entity or a public-private partnership to purchase the land. A straight-up land auction is still technically on the table, but my sense is that it鈥檚 being considered as an option-of-last-resort.
So what happened in the legislature this session?
Not much, ultimately. None of the Elliott bills even made it to a floor vote. One of those would have forced the state to resume timber sales at a relatively high level. The other two were designed to help the State Land Board take the Elliott State Forest out of the Common School Fund.
So where does this leave the Elliott State Forest?
There鈥檚 a big decision coming 鈥� the State Land Board will decide next month what to do with the Elliott.
A big message they鈥檝e been hearing from conservation-minded Oregonians is that the whole system is fundamentally flawed. It forces a choice between funding education and protecting forests. Critics say these two things should be decoupled.
Is the state leaning toward any particular way forward?
Right now, there seems to be a preference for finding some kind of public/private partnership to take over ownership. State officials are meeting with stakeholders this month. They鈥檙e hoping to find groups who want to be part of a larger deal. John Potter with State Lands told me ideally this kind of strategy would prevent future lawsuits.
John Potter: 鈥淭hat would be a great outcome. However, this is a very complex issue and it鈥檚 more than likely that somebody is not going to be happy with the outcome in the end. And we kind of realize that. The hope is that enough people can feel like what we have come up with is a positive way forward.鈥�
The next stakeholder meetings are this coming Thursday [July 16] in Coos Bay. And then a decision is expected at the State Land Board鈥檚 next meeting in mid-August.
Thanks for the update, Jes.
Thanks.
